We have seen in other articles that I have published on this site that those of us who have suffered significant childhood trauma are more likely than others to develop addictions (often multiple addictions) during our teens and adulthood. Why should this be?
Condition Two: The rat has the company of other rats and has an enriched (ie stimulating) environment
– In condition one rats became extremely addicted to the cocaine, becoming heavily addicted
– In condition two rats ingested far less cocaine (75% less) and did not become addicted
(The psychologist, Professor Bruce Alexander, pioneered these studies).
If we extrapolate from this research (ie apply it to humans) it would be expected that :
Individuals with empty, lonely lives are significantly more likely to become addicts than individuals with full and socially integrated lived. Indeed, there is much research evidence to support this view and a growing school of thought is of the view that a person’s life situation plays a more important role in an individuals addiction than the addictive substance itself.
It is likely, then, that a person’s life circumstances play a vital role in whether or not a person becomes an addict. Therefore, it follows that the most effective way to reduce addiction is to help addicts re-connect with society and gain dependable social support.
Because those who have suffered childhood trauma are more likely to develop chaotic, disenfranchised lives as adults, as many of the articles on this site have shown, such people are at greater risk than others of living in the kind of social isolation which fosters drug addiction.
David Hosier BSc Hons; MSc; PGDE(FAHE).